Proposition 213, passed by California voters in 1996,
prescribes that uninsured motorists injured in a car accident, where they are
the driver, cannot recover damages for pain and suffering. Compensation may be
limited solely to economic damages, such as medical bills, property damage and
lost wages. The insurance companies lobbied for this law in 1996, in order to
save money in court claims. So it’s very important for you to have valid liability
auto insurance, and to keep the policy in your vehicle at all times. Otherwise,
you could deprive yourself of compensation that you may deserve and are
entitled to after a car accident where someone else is at fault.
Friday, April 10, 2015
Sunday, January 11, 2015
Recession-Driven Cutbacks Produce Court Bottleneck
Recent funding cutbacks in California’s huge court
system have created long lines and short tempers at the state’s numerous
courthouses. Without significantly more state money in the coming year,
personal injury and other civil cases being filed today may not reach trial for
five years. This is considerably longer than the previous 1 to 1.5-year
backlog, under the now defunct Fast Track rules instituted in Los Angeles
County. Many of the court delays result from staff shortages, thus allowing
legal documents to pile up and delaying case resolutions and judgments.
Friday, November 21, 2014
Fewer Claims May Be Filed in Jammed Court System
The withering California economy continues to impact
the state’s court system, as budget cutbacks have slowed the hearing of cases
to a near standstill. One judge has gone so far as to say we are on the
borderline of a constitutional crisis…especially with personal injury and other
civil cases taking up to 5 years to reach trial, close to the mandatory
dismissal date.
Governor
Jerry Brown’s proposed budget for the coming year will continue to make it
challenging for the courts. He has proposed a $105 million increase, which most
judicial analysts say is not nearly enough to unclog the case load. Local
reserve funds used in the past are now dried up. So it appears now that fewer
people are filing, discouraged by delays and longer commutes to fewer
courthouses. If you still feel that you have a legitimate case, however, the
best course of action is always to file. Justice is not always swift, but it
can be meaningful.
Friday, May 16, 2008
Do You Have a Medical Malpractice Case?
If you feel you are entitled to monetary damages from medical malpractice, ask yourself these two questions: did the physician’s or hospital’s performance fall below the general standard of care and did injury result from the medical provider’s conduct? If you can answer “yes” in both instances, then you may have a legitimate case.
The “standard of care” relates to the medical professional’s diagnosis, care and treatment of the patient. To prove that the standard of care was subpar, it’s very important to gather all of the medical records that are relevant to the case because they will have to be evaluated by a medical expert who will then provide pertinent testimony. Remember…to successfully pursue a medical malpractice lawsuit, you must have an “expert” witness in order to prove a breach of care and to show the causal connection between the breach and the resulting injuries or damages.
If certain risks or potential complications of a medical procedure are disclosed by Informed Consent by the medical practitioner, and the patient acknowledges these risks and elects to undergo the procedure, this Informed Consent agreement is generally a defense to a malpractice action. Should there be no Informed Consent previous to the complications, however, then a malpractice lawsuit may be warranted. Every doctor or medical practitioner is duty-bound to provide full disclosure to patients and obtain Informed Consent prior to performing any surgery or invasive testing. Whenever there is any confusion about what constitutes possible malpractice, it’s prudent to arrange a “no obligation” consultation with a qualified attorney specializing in this field, such as George L. Mallory, Jr. & Associates.
We hope this information is helpful to you. Next time, we will discuss what, if any, costs may be involved with filing a malpractice lawsuit.
The “standard of care” relates to the medical professional’s diagnosis, care and treatment of the patient. To prove that the standard of care was subpar, it’s very important to gather all of the medical records that are relevant to the case because they will have to be evaluated by a medical expert who will then provide pertinent testimony. Remember…to successfully pursue a medical malpractice lawsuit, you must have an “expert” witness in order to prove a breach of care and to show the causal connection between the breach and the resulting injuries or damages.
If certain risks or potential complications of a medical procedure are disclosed by Informed Consent by the medical practitioner, and the patient acknowledges these risks and elects to undergo the procedure, this Informed Consent agreement is generally a defense to a malpractice action. Should there be no Informed Consent previous to the complications, however, then a malpractice lawsuit may be warranted. Every doctor or medical practitioner is duty-bound to provide full disclosure to patients and obtain Informed Consent prior to performing any surgery or invasive testing. Whenever there is any confusion about what constitutes possible malpractice, it’s prudent to arrange a “no obligation” consultation with a qualified attorney specializing in this field, such as George L. Mallory, Jr. & Associates.
We hope this information is helpful to you. Next time, we will discuss what, if any, costs may be involved with filing a malpractice lawsuit.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)